DUSSELDORF. “We have been protesting!” A professor from North Rhine-Westphalia wrote us this 7 days, on behalf of his team users. We documented excerpts of the seven-web page reasoning (read in this article), which sparked great curiosity: since then, we have obtained dozens of inquiries as to no matter whether the full protest text, which includes associated resources, could be attained. We contacted the creator, who made it accessible to us for publication on News4teachers. Vital: The doc is for informational uses and for reference only and can not / should not merely be copied.
It can be downloaded in this article.
Author’s comment: What surprises me, nevertheless, is that these details of criticism that we tackle in our writings are genuinely obvious. Why can’t the related unions get a thing like this up and running and coordinate it? Why is nothing at all coming from this path, no grouped motion (also in the desire of the utilized teachers)? Why are you left by itself with this sort of a protest in a vast hallway, allowing something like that degenerate into mosquito bites? Whereby: We are already discussing no matter whether then we will also choose the pending lawful recourse following the approved rejection of Düsseldorf … Information4lecturers
We are protesting! How academics make clear to the university inspection why they now consider their provider to be illegal
Professional bacon fanatic. Explorer. Avid pop culture expert. Introvert. Amateur web evangelist.