He stopped the initially attack with self confidence. The Würzburg historian Benjamin Hasselhorn accused his Berlin colleague Niklas Weber, nearly with glee, of owning drawn a distorted picture of him in the “Süddeutsche Zeitung”.
He dismissed the genuine accusation that he was part of a new right-wing community, but demanded in his assertion on the Julian Maximilians College web page that the complete variety of his statements be taken into account.
Hasselhorn defined that his contributions to the “Blue Narcissus”, born of the Pennale fraternity in Chemnitz, had been sins of the youth, and the texts of the new suitable-wing magazine “Cato” had to be as opposed with publications in the “NZZ” or the Tagesspiegel .
The now 34-yr-outdated, who has a 2nd doctorate in theology, demanded a new seriousness from the Evangelical Church in April 2019, not without the need of calling in a essential witness in whom Hasselhorn’s colourful persona can be acknowledged.
His spirited essay is a compliment to Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson, who requires the appropriate tips from the cultural still left where by he can, and in performing so, truly catches a single or the other narrow-mindedness. The YouTube star, additional provocative than authentic reactionary, is remarkably revered by American significantly-rightists.
Birthday card for a revisionist
In “Merkur” (No. 859, December 2020, € 14, merkur-zeitschrift.de) Niklas Weber has added extra. Get Hasselhorn, who appeared on the Bundestag’s cultural committee as a CDU skilled for Hohenzollern payment, at the term of the journalistic gamut.
In his detective operate on textual criticism, he shows how Hasselhorn, less than the pseudonym Dominique Riwal, apparently copied from his own e book “Königstod” in a publication commemorating the 60th birthday of revisionist historian Karlheinz Weißmann. Edited by Dieter Stein, editor-in-chief of “Junge Freiheit,” the volume was released in the weekly’s inner version, which testimonials the concept of conservatism with an identity record.
What appears to be a private dispute, using the illustration of Weißmann’s positions, is an investigation into the record of suggestions that reveals in an exemplary way how hasty exclusion by the guild and self-deprecation as a result of seemingly apolitical objectivity perform into arms of other people.
It also reveals an outlet whose statements of solidarity with Hasselhorn in the identify of independence of expression surface to be a lot less principled than sympathetic for the trigger. In addition to HU historian Jörg Baberowski, the head of Hasselhorn in Würzburg, Peter Hoeres, holder of the Chair of Modern day Background, also stood out.
They are all remarkably educated, scientifically confirmed, and mainly intellectually satisfying people who simply just have no fascination in differentiating what they sell as conservatism from the awkwardness of the AfD. Hoeres, for illustration, has already carried out two times at the Berlin Conservatism Library, a team of suitable-wing pundits that grew out of the decaying mountains of publications from “Criticon” publisher Caspar von Schrenck-Notzing.
[Wenn Sie alle aktuellen Nachrichten live auf Ihr Handy haben wollen, empfehlen wir Ihnen unsere runderneuerte App, die Sie hier für Apple- und Android-Geräte herunterladen können.]
Hoeres writes for “Tichy’s Perception.” In a checklist of outstanding conservative thinkers, he mentions several irreproachable names, as properly as Alexander Gauland’s speechwriter Michael Klonovsky and writer Uwe Tellkamp, whom he had invited to Würzburg for a conference on the German newspaper marketplace. And endorses Karlheinz Weißmann as a keyword.
You can study it in the Catholic “Tagespost”, which has a short while ago attracted additional and a lot more proper-wing voices that broke the Christian social spectrum. A new conservative revolution? In any situation, this conservatism did not go considerably beyond the illiberal venom of Armin Mohler cited by Hoeres.