Tech Gaming Report

Latest Tech & Gaming News

Listing in the case of the problematic side Userbenchmark

Listing in the case of the problematic side Userbenchmark

of Maximilian Hohm
An engineering sample of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X has been listed on the problematic Userbenchmark page, meaning an objective comparison between AMD and Intel is not possible. However, the chip seems to perform very well, especially when compared to its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 5600X. Read more about this below.

AMD’s upcoming Zen 4 processors should build on the success of Zen 3 with DDR5 memory support and architectural improvements and deliver even better performance. The rumored lineup is very similar to the lineup of current Ryzen 5000 models, so optimal processors can be re-purchased for different requirement profiles. An engineering sample of a Ryzen 5 7600X has now surfaced, making its rounds on the troublesome Userbenchmark website.

AMD Ryzen 7000: AMD itself names four models, Ryzen 9 with 170 watts TDP
Conclusion for comparison with user benchmark



Conclusión para la comparación con Userbenchmark <span class="sourceLinkwrapper">[Quelle: <a href="https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Advanced-Marketing-Devices-7600X-vs-Intel-Core-i7-12700K/m1898605vs4119">Userbenchmark</a>]</span>” src=”https://news.google.com/screenshots/380×214/2022/07/Screenshot-2022-07-30-100231-pcgh.jpg” width=”473″ height=”214″/></span></p>
<p></span><br />
<!-- Ende Item --><br />
<!-- Start Item ImageTeaser --><br />
<span class=

Conclusión para la comparación con Userbenchmark <span class="sourceLinkwrapper">[Quelle: <a href="https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Advanced-Marketing-Devices-7600X-vs-Intel-Core-i7-12700K/m1898605vs4119">Userbenchmark</a>]</span>” src=”https://news.google.com/screenshots/380×214/2022/07/Screenshot-2022-07-30-100316-pcgh.png” width=”300″ height=”214″/></span></p><div class=








Conclusión para la comparación con Userbenchmark <span class="sourceLinkwrapper">[Quelle: <a href="https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Advanced-Marketing-Devices-7600X-vs-Intel-Core-i7-12700K/m1898605vs4119">Userbenchmark</a>]</span>” src=”https://news.google.com/screenshots/380×214/2022/07/Screenshot-2022-07-30-095212-pcgh.png” width=”450″ ​​height=”214″/></span></p>
<p></span><br />
<!-- Ende Item --><br />
</span><br />
<!-- Ende ImageTeaser Container --><br />
</span></p>
<p>The engineering sample has OPN code 100-000000593-20_Y and was tested on an Asrock N7-B65XT motherboard in combination with DDR5 4800 memory. According to the Userbenchmark entry, the Ryzen 5 7600X has six cores and twelve threads.  The base clock is said to be 4.4 GHz, while the turbo clock is said to be 4.95 GHz. The base clock would be 700 MHz higher than the Ryzen 5 5600X predecessor, while the turbo clock “only ” would increase by 350 MHz.</p>
<div style=


Since Userbenchmark has an extreme Intel bias and peculiar testing philosophy, the results between Intel and AMD processors are always problematic, but the data can be used to make initial comparisons between different AMD models. Compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X, the ES chip is said to have 56% higher single-core performance, and even when using four cores, it is still 49% faster than its predecessor. After the website lists the chip under the name Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X and the gallery statement is still valid, further objective comparisons are unfortunately not possible.

Font: user reference point